Am I the only one that finds the "NAV erosion" discourse to be utterly stupid? CC fund investors talk about "oh this fund doesn't have any NAV erosion" and you look at the fund and it's some single stock CC ETF for a stock that's been performing well since the fund was launched.
If you don't understand how these funds work, isn't it incredibly dumb to be invested in them? Before I invested into factor funds, I read books and academic articles about factor investing. Before I invested in a convertible arb fund, I read the textbook written by the fund manager on convertible arb. Why do "income investors" think it's okay to be so ignorant about the funds they invest in?
