Same as what I said on your prior post 2hrs ago, prior to you adding SPMO. "How much downside risk are you comfortable with? A portfolio rating shouldn't just be about potential upside, it should factor in your specific risk tolerance as well. You've built a growth heavy portfolio, which is fine as long as you understand the potential risks. As an example, VOO is essentially the S&P 500 index and that dropped ~58% from 2007-2009. QQQM is essentially the Nasdaq which dropped ~78% from 2000-2002. The biggest pullback in SCHG was ~35% in 2022, but it's only been around since 2009. You already know what kind of upside these funds can deliver, just gotta decide if you're comfortable with the potential downside that comes with it."
Moj @momoneynoproblem Β· 22d
Itβs okay but itβs pretty much owning the same things over and over again. Personally if I could only choose 4 US, 30% VOO 30% SPMO 25% SCHD 15% SOXQ
Silver BTC King@silverking Β· 22d
Looks like the same thing 4 times π
Jamey Carson@jameycarson Β· 22d
Always heavy in $SPMO I have a 60/40 portfolio $SCHG and $SPMO .
Clantosa @clantosa Β· 21dEdited
I'd give it a C. You're basically buying 4 different funds all with US exposure that all function the exact same way. This is basically diworseification. Adding stuff together with no added benefit I'd go 50% VOO, 25% $VEA, 10% $VWO, 15% in your choice
You must have an account to viewCreate an account for the full Blossom experience!
Join the conversation with 500,000+ other investors πΈ
Create an account to get access to everything Blossom has to offer!
π Personalized algorithm based on your investing style, experience level and interests
π Powerful portfolio and dividend tracking tools
π See what top creators and others in the community are investing in